Self-Blame=Bullsh*t
Ever have someone tell you that we're all just as responsible for environmental damage, because we use oil from the ground and wood from clearcut forests? I keep hearing this from time to time. The problem is, it's complete bullshit.
I didn't choose to live this way. If you're reading this, you probably didn't either. I've tried to live in a different way. And I mean radically different, separate from the industrial economy. Then I encountered a series of problems: legal, logistical, social, and corporate. Corporations, for instance, own most of the land in this country. That makes it hard to find a place to set up camp. Laws exist to keep people from living without a house, even if you actually have one and they just don't like it (because you made it yourself and it doesn't require you to contribute to the economy). And very few towns are set up with the intent of making it easy for someone to get around without an automobile.
We're also duped into thinking that expensive schooling is the only way to get educated (or a valid way at all), putting us into debt, which requires us to work, which means we need an address, a car, insurance for the house and car, debt from the car, etc. etc. Considering that a lot of our impact environmentally is from food (i.e. the stuff that you need to live), it's hard to fault a family of four with parents working wage slave jobs for not always buying their food from the local organic farmer who doesn't use artificial fertilizer. Even I'm not able to abstain from oil-related commerce, and I'm considered pretty handy in the wilderness and garden. I've had friends who lasted for a while living off the land, and without already having funds you have to resort to skirting the law (read: without being well-off to begin with, it's too damned expensive to be poor). They're all eventually forced back into civilized society, usually because of laws. They tried to live another way. Our culture hates that.
Like so many situations in our abusive culture, the model of abuse and victim blaming is replicated: Blaming the average citizen for being in the situation they don't like and didn't choose (but maybe thought they did) is like blaming a dependent housewife with a controlling husband for staying with him. She could leave him if he's violent or otherwise abusive, but the deck is stacked against her.
That's not to say that citizens aren't ever responsible; plenty of people go on and use plenty more energy and oil products than they need to, fully aware of the impacts. They definitely share at least a bit of blame. But the real people at fault, the real enemies (yes, enemies) are the people who think they own everything and are calling the shots. It's the people sitting in offices trying to control the world and using everyone else as resources and pawns. They set the system up so that we need to buy their products, to buy into the system.
Blaming everyone for the damages of this culture is pretty damned racist and classist. It's the same old "we're all one" bullshit that white, New-Agey peaceniks always spout to cover up their race and class based privilege. It's the pretension of saying that because you're not personally racist (always debateable) that you don't contribute to racial inequality.(Here's a clue folks: simply saying we're the same isn't going to help make us all equal, no matter how much your guru says the law of attraction can fix the world). It lets yuppies ignore that not everyone can shop at WholePaycheck to buy supposedly non-poisoned food, or have easily accessed public libraries to bring their kids to (or themselves).
Until we ditch this habit of activists, especially those of the armchair variety, innappropriately/disproportionately pinning blame on victims, we aren't going to see any useful action. Useful action springs from correct philosophy and analysis. We're unlikely to see the average Jane and Joe on the street digging deep at the roots until the shared story of our culture is no longer the one perpetuated by mass media and public
I'm not holding my breath.
Labels: activism, anti-racism, civilization, ecology, environment, privilege, responsibility, self-sufficiency



5 Comments:
At October 25, 2010 at 8:41 PM ,
MrsQ said...
-
At
October 26, 2010 at 2:16 AM ,
Anonymous said...
-
At
July 9, 2011 at 8:00 PM ,
Anonymous said...
-
At
July 9, 2011 at 8:00 PM ,
Anonymous said...
-
At
July 14, 2011 at 10:39 PM ,
29,000 Acorns said...
-
lol, I gotta stop reading your posts, Dan. I'm getting paranoid. I keep thinking you're talking about me.
I really liked this post because of the no-nonsense honesty. In terms of simple numbers, right now 43.6 million Americans live in poverty, 41 million live on food stamps, whites have 14x the median household net worth of blacks and latinos, women get paid less for equivalent labor, and the top 5% of Americans have 72% of the financial wealth. The field of political representation fits quite neatly into those divisions as well. The class, race and sex stats clearly demonstrate an economic and political division of the degree of responsibility, and I haven't even mentioned the disparity between nations. In terms of the sheer amount of what gets consumed, the white male elite of the global north have the most blood on their hands, and force everyone else to go along with their agenda via various mechanisms of brainwashing and coercion. As Derrick Jensen has stated, "So what I’m really talking about when I’m talking about bringing down civilization is depriving the rich of their ability to steal from the poor, and depriving the powerful of their ability to destroy the planet. I don’t think there’s many people who would not be behind that. Then everything else is just tactics, you know? The question becomes one of targeting."
-John
hey i reprinted this with a link to your blog on my blog, is that cool? because i had started a blog essay about this very topic - when i am talking to land spirits and explaining stuff, i kept saying "we humans did this" and "i am sorry we humands did that" and then i was like WTF? i grew up in that first wave of 1970s homesteaders off the grid, was a punk rock squatter, am an activist, and work as hard as i can to make my lifeway one that reflects the values i have about everyone human and other-than-human being equally important. i didn't do this. a select group of white, rich men with narcistic personality disorder started it, most people got forced into it, no one thought they had options usually, very few knew it was even wrong, and it's really hard to escape! no one can drop out at this point. all those radical homemaker type books neglect to mention property tax and goat vet bills, and no state i know of will accept payment in canned tomatoes.
when i can i do eat organic and local. and other times all my money goes to expensive specialists and medical treatments and i'll be at a food bank. the thing is, it's not all or none, since no one can be eco-pure and untouched at this point. and it is not our fault - we were born into it. like i got born into being a white american - i can beat myself up for that or i can change things. i had to stop being a misanthrope when i realized it meant i had to hate me too, and i was sick of thinking i was a parasite on Earth or whatever nonsense people say. all it did was make me feel bad, and when people feel bad they shut down and do LESS to change things. heather awen adventures in animism
PS although i have issues with the us/them mentality of the jensen crew, and the testosterone levels of it being mostly young white manarchists, and him saying he knows what it like to be a woman because he knows sexualized violence (that is not what makes me a woman), plus he tell people to blow shit up when he isnt (i call it the trying to make your readers stop being patty heasrt and become tanya syndrome as you stay home typing the next book) and also i have friends who did blow shit up in the 70s and 80s and guess what? fuck all changed - i do agree with his take on society today and the interconnectedness of the problems stemming from the narcistic corporate elite. (actually many many CEOs etc do have narcistic personality disorder, it is fascinating to study) - but i do like the rewilding scene and critiques and your blog is by far my favorite to read! my main issue with that scene is the lack of diversity. i am 40 and have seen lots of waves of angry young men with ideals buying guns and be it because they are neo-nazis, black panthers or eco-warriors, they tend to just "grow up" and forget it, or end up in prison by accident, and nothing changes. very few stick around to teach the young men from wisdom. i am eager to see if in 20 years the rewilding scene goes from being manarchists to wise elders. i didn't invent manarchists - that's a term in canada women started using in the anrcho-scene about how offensive they found much of jensen's writing. plus you know when a male editor friend at 5th estate decides to tell me how to e a better feminist, well, manarchist kinda sums it all up. if a scene mainly attracts white, young guys, i feel like i have seen in the animal liberation front, US army training, and the footbal riots. when bridges are made with inner city black older women, lesbian moms, and working poor average joes and janes, then i start to think there might be enough diversity for it to be a safe environment and a monoculture. anarchism is far too male agressive monculture. the us/them thinking i see in some rewilders' writing makes me think that its doomed - diversity is key. i read recently about some indian eco-science guys being invited to speak to greenpeace and they were annoyed by "college students yelling the sky is faling". we need a lot more diversity of age, gender, class, and ethnicity for this to work, so i wish there was more of a focus on building bridges not bombing them.
Heather: Thanks for your input, but I don't know what you mean in your critique of Jensen. I won't beat around the bush: I think you're dead wrong, and parroting the incorrect critiques others try to levy against him and his works. In my personal, direct experience, most of those who most strongly support Derrick's work are women. Please, take time to actually read through Derrick's arguments honestly if you want to come to my blog and complain. I'm so tired of hearing the fallacious argument "he tells people to blow up bridges but doesn't himself". It's both logically irrelevant and assuming; you can't know what he does in his time, and he has hinted about taking out small dams with hand tools. Same goes with the rewilding scene: again, none of my experience has shown the machismo you seem to see, but rather quite the opposite. When I host gatherings, it's predominantly women attending and coming up with ideas to build community.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home